Mostrar mensagens com a etiqueta DST/STD. Mostrar todas as mensagens
Mostrar mensagens com a etiqueta DST/STD. Mostrar todas as mensagens

segunda-feira, 23 de julho de 2012

Students Confront Contraceptive Establishment With "1Flesh" Website - by Elizabeth Crnkovich

I PRI

“We want sexy back!” This is the cry of today's generation, raised in a sex-drenched culture that threatens to empty relationships between the sexes of all love, meaning and romance. 

A network of university students from around the country, brought together by Marc Barnes, knew that human sexuality was intended to be something beautiful, and that it deserved greater respect and appreciation in the world today. They decided that it was high time that someone told the truth about sex, and exposed the root of today's widespread sexual dissatisfaction. 

So it was that in May of this year, these students launched a website entitled: “1Flesh: The Revolt Against Contraception in Marriage.” They described their effort as “A grassroots movement in opposition to the use of artificial contraception, dedicated to bringing great sex to the entire universe.” 

The sexual revolution of the last generation has left a legacy of broken lives and broken hearts for all to see. Young people do not want to make the same mistakes as their parents and older siblings. They want to be seen as persons, not sex objects. They want romance, not the humdrum boredom of loveless sex. They want monogamy, not the multiple partners that leads to STDs. Today's generation is searching to regain what their parents lost. 

1Flesh believes that things went wrong when contraception entered marriage. Not only is contraception not the answer, they believe that it is a root cause of all our present ills. It lessens the bond of sexual union, dulls its unifying nature, and causes many health problems that could be avoided if couples used natural family planning. This is where 1Flesh takes a stand against society's current practices. 

The goal of 1Flesh is “to spread words of rebellion; that sex should be awesome and saved until marriage, that pregnancy can be justly avoided without harmful chemicals, and that love is worth fighting for.” 

The website contains a vast array of images, videos, testimonies, data, and statistics all arguing against the use of artificial birth control and in favor of what it likes to call “100% organic sex.” It also introduces readers to a natural and healthy means of fertility regulation, namely, Natural Family Planning. It explains the benefits of several different NFP methods, such as The Creighton Model Fertiltycare System and The Billings Ovulation Method, in detail. 

And that’s not all. The website is chock full of information about the emotional, physical, and environmental dangers of artificial birth control, all told with flashy and attention-grabbing visuals that I found both informative and entertaining. 

In their own words, 1Flesh strives “to inform women of the risks of birth control pills, to call out pharmaceutical companies for their life-endangering, false and manipulating advertising of the drugs, and to promote the concept that women can understand and work with their own fertility instead of relying on pharmaceutical companies.” 

I was impressed by the detailed explanations of how men and women are harmed emotionally and physically by the use of contraceptives such as the pill and condoms. I was particularly touched by testimonies from former contraception users, many of whom now rely upon NFP, about how they have found physical and emotional health again after experiencing the negative impact of contraceptives in their lives. 

The website has received a great deal of publicity since it went online in May, and Marc Barnes has been interviewed by the Huffington Post and other media outlets. As you might expect, the site has also received more than its share of attacks. 

But Marc and his collaborators are hanging in there, fighting the good fight. They saw the need, heard the cries, saw the demand, and so took action. We at PRI salute them!

quinta-feira, 5 de agosto de 2010

Reevaluating US Blood Donation Restrictions


On June 10 and 11, 2010, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Advisory Committee on Blood Product Safety and Availability (CBPSA) met to evaluate the FDA’s lifetime ban on donations from men who have had sex with other men since 1977. The committee voted 9-6 to recommend that the FDA make no alterations to the current policy. A CNN article on the topic included the following quote from Jay Brooks, professor of pathology at the University of Texas Health Science Center in San Antonio:

The issue of blood donation has “nothing to do with someone being gay. Any group that's epidemiologically at risk of making blood unsafe, it's unfortunate. ... It's a matter of epidemiology."

The different standards between gay and straight people exist because the risk of HIV is much lower in heterosexuals, he said."The interest of the recipient is greater than any donor," Brooks said. "I'd hate to tell the one person who got HIV through a blood transfusion, 'Sorry, we changed the regulation.'"

(Source: Madison Park, “Federal Ban on Gay Men's Blood Donation to be Reconsidered.” CNN, 26 May 2010, http://www.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/05/25/gay.blood.donation.ban/index.html.)