Mostrar mensagens com a etiqueta Perseguição religiosa. Mostrar todas as mensagens
Mostrar mensagens com a etiqueta Perseguição religiosa. Mostrar todas as mensagens

domingo, 19 de janeiro de 2014

Cuomo to Catholics: You’re Not Welcome in NY - by George J. Marlin

In TCT

I was born in New York State and have lived here for more than 61 years. During that time I have paid plenty in state and local taxes and have served the public in a number of capacities including two terms as Executive Director of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey.
I am also a Catholic and a member of New York’s Conservative Party, have served on the transition teams of governors-elect George Pataki (R) and Andrew Cuomo (D), and have been a member of Cuomo’s Council of Economic and Fiscal Advisors.
Yet despite my public service and the large chunk of my earnings that have gone to support New York’s governmental maze, according to Governor Cuomo, I should move out of the Empire State.
Why?  Because I am pro-life, oppose same-sex marriage, and have doubts about Cuomo’s 2013 hastily prepared gun legislation (the SAFE Act) that permits you to buy a gun with a 10-round magazine, but bans using more than seven shots if you need to defend yourself.      
Here’s what Cuomo said this past Friday on “The Capital Pressroom,” an Albany radio talk show, about a large segment of NY voters:
Who are they? Are they these extreme conservatives who are right to life, pro-assault weapons, anti-gay? Is that who they are?  Because if that’s who they are and they’re the extreme conservatives, they have no place in the state of New York because that’s not who New Yorkers are.
In an unguarded moment, Governor Cuomo stated publicly what many on the Left have been privately thinking for years: that pro-life and pro-traditional marriage supporters are Ku Klux Klan-like bigots who should either shut up or get out.
Cuomo has not only written off millions of New York Christians and Jews (among others) as unfit citizens, he has yanked the welcome mat from under half the nation’s population, who, public opinion polls indicate, oppose abortion and same-sex marriage.
As for those who “have no place in the state of New York,” the person at the top of that list must be the Archbishop of New York, Cardinal Timothy Dolan. That’s because Dolan has proudly followed in the footsteps of his predecessors who were unabashed defenders of Church teachings in the public square.
For instance, Cardinal Terence Cooke, NYC’s seventh archbishop (1968-1983), whose cause is being promoted for sainthood, publicly fought the passage of the state’s 1970 liberal abortion bill. And the week Roe v. Wade was handed down by the Supreme Court, he issued a pastoral letter that was read in every parish condemning abortion as a “fundamental moral evil.”  Cooke inaugurated the annual Respect Life week and established “Birth Right,” a service to help pregnant women who choose not to abort their babies.
As for “gay rights,” every year Cooke opposed proposed legislation in New York’s City Council that would have amended the administrative code to outlaw discrimination due to “sexual orientation or affectional preference.” You read that right.
A typical statement expressing the Church’s position, released by Cardinal Cooke in April 1978, reads:
If the bill has an underlying purpose, to advocate and gain approval of homosexual behavior and lifestyle, then there is no way in which the Catholic Church in the City of New York may find it acceptable. And there is no way in which we can remain silent on the issue.
The Catholic Church’s moral teaching differentiates between “orientation” and “behavior” for both homosexuals and heterosexuals. While a person’s orientation is not subject to moral evaluation, there is no doubt that a person’s behavior is subject to evaluation. Homosexual behavior and an attendant homosexual life style is not in accord with Catholic moral teaching and is, in fact, harmful to all persons who become involved; heterosexuality is the norm for human behavior.
And lest we forget, in the mid-1970s Cooke had an ally in his fight against abortion and gay rights: Mario Cuomo, father of the current governor.
The New York Times reported during Cuomo the Elder’s unsuccessful 1974 primary run for lieutenant governor that he said in a televised debate that “he would have voted against the 1970 law that relaxed abortion curbs in the state.”  The New York Daily News and the Post also reported that, in his unsuccessful 1977 run for mayor, Mario said he would veto a gay rights bill “that would give homosexual teachers the right to proselytize or advocate their lifestyle.”
I wonder if Governor Andrew Cuomo, a baptized Catholic and a graduate of Archbishop Molloy High School and Fordham University, will demand that Cooke’s cause for canonization be, well, aborted because the cardinal was an “extremist” for defending the teachings of his Church. Will ask his father, himself a former governor, to leave the state for having politically incorrect thoughts forty years ago?
By claiming that people who disagree with his cultural views “have no place in the state of New York,” Cuomo has joined those whom historian Richard Hofstadter described as “totalitarian liberals,” people who employ illiberal means to achieve so-called liberal reforms.
Cardinal Dolan and the bishops of New York’s other eight dioceses have an obligation to respond and to condemn anyone – especially any Catholic public figure – who threatens those who adhere to Church doctrine.
Chicago’s Cardinal Francis George has predicted that he will die in his bed, his successor will die in prison, and his successor will die a martyr. We may not be quite there yet. But unless Church leaders and others act quickly and forcefully, Catholics and others of traditional moral views may find themselves not simply marginalized, but – if some politicians have their way – facing something very like exile in their own nation.

domingo, 5 de maio de 2013

Si compartes tu fe cristiana en el Ejército de Estados Unidos, un consejo de guerra; si dices que eres gay, bienvenido

In ForumLibertas

En un impresionante ataque sobre los derechos de expresión religiosa de los soldados estadounidenses, la administración que lidera Barak Hussein Obama ha lanzado un comunicado confirmando algo impensable: cualquier soldado que profese el cristianismo desde ahora puede ser presentado ante un consejo de guerra y ser encarcelado con una baja deshonrosa del ejército. Eso sí, hace casi dos años la misma Administración revocó la política 'Don't ask, don't tell' (no preguntes, no cuentes) que prohibía a los homosexuales revelar abiertamente su orientación sexual si querían servir en las fuerzas armadas del país

Ahora, el Pentágono afirma que "el proselitismo religioso no está permitido dentro del Departamento de Defensa... las cortes marciales y los castigos no judiciales serán decididos caso por caso...". Esta declaración sigue a una reciente reunión entre funcionarios del Pentágono y el activista anti-cristiano Mikey Weinstein, quien ayudó a diseñar los nuevos castigos para los cristianos que se atrevan a cometer "el crimen de odio" de compartir su fe con otros.

Weinstein es el director de la Fundación Libertad Religiosa Militar, y dice que los cristianos, incluyendo capellanes son culpables de "traición" por compartir el evangelio de Jesucristo y también son culpables de cometer un acto de "violación espiritual" tan serio como "una violación sexual". También afirmó que los cristianos que comparten su fe en las fuerzas armadas son "enemigos de la Constitución".

De este modo los asesores del presidente Barack Obama en el Pentágono están confirmando que los militares cristianos que compartan su fe estarán cometiendo un crimen “y como resultado: prisión. Esto incluye a capellanes militares y oficiales que son ordenados clérigos de su fe (en su mayoría pastores cristianos y rabinos judíos” cuyo servicio desde la fundación de la milicia estadounidense bajo George Washington tiene como propósito enseñar su fe y ministrar las necesidades espirituales de las tropas que acuden a ellos en busca de consejo, instrucción o apoyo emocional.

Esta regulación limitará severamente las expresiones de fe judeo-cristiana en las fuerzas armadas, incluso entre amigos cercanos. También podría abolir el cargo de capellán en el ejército, ya que no permitiría que los capellanes (o algún miembro del servicio, para el caso) hablar de su fe.

En respuesta a los planes del Pentágono, el teniente general retirado Jerry Boykin, quien ahora es el vicepresidente ejecutivo del Consejo de Investigación Familiar (FRC), dijo en Fox & Friends el miércoles por la mañana: “Es ambiguo lo que quieren decir con ‘proselitismo’. Creo que tienen sus definiciones un poco confundidas. Si usted está hablando de la coerción es una cosa, pero si estás hablando del libre ejercicio de nuestra fe como soldados individuales, marineros, aviadores e infantes de marina, especialmente para los capellanes, que creo que lo peor que podemos hacer es detener la posibilidad de que un soldado sea capaz de ejercer su fe”.

Pero los homosexuales ganan visibilidad

Esta política ligada al laicismo agresivo que quiere limitar la visibilidad del cristianismo en la vida pública contrasta con el hecho de que en julio de 2011 el presidente de Estados Unidos, Barack Obama, revocara formalmente la política 'Don't ask, don't tell' (no preguntes, no cuentes) que prohibía a los homosexuales revelar abiertamente su orientación sexual si querían servir en las fuerzas armadas del país. La prohibición databa de 1993.

El Congreso había revocado la normativa en aquel diciembre, pero ésta necesitaba que tanto el presidente como el Pentágono certificaran que permitir que los gays sirvan en el Ejército revelando abiertamente su orientación sexual no afectaría la disciplina militar, algo que ambas instituciones hicieron.

En un comunicado emitido por la Casa Blanca, Obama anunció que tanto él como la cúpula militar habían completado dicha certificación.

"Hemos dado el último gran paso para poner fin a la discriminatoria ley 'No preguntes, no cuentes', que minaba nuestra disposición militar y violaba los principios estadounidenses de igualdad y justicia", sostuvo el mandatario.


sexta-feira, 25 de janeiro de 2013

O desatino do povo de Deus em Portugal - por Nuno Serras Pereira



Nesta nação em que nos foi dado nascer e viver a maioria da sociedade, que se confessa católica, está inteiramente desnorteada pela propaganda quotidiana do que lhe é incutido pela maior parte dos políticos, de grande parte da comunicação social e a espaços por não poucos prelados. De facto, todo o mundo está persuadido de que o maior problema do nosso país, e quiçá do mundo, é a crise económico-financeira. Sem negar, de modo algum, a seriedade desta e a urgência de a ultrapassar deve-se, no entanto, afirmar que há assuntos bem mais graves, que passam ao lado daqueles que controlam o que devemos saber, os assuntos em que devemos pensar, as conversas que devemos ter.

Há aí alguém que tenha consciência de que no mundo de hoje, de cinco em cinco minutos, se assassina um cristão por causa da sua Fé? Quem se detém em noticiar e aprofundar a matança de cento e cinco mil cristãos exterminados, por causa da sua Fé, só no ano passado? E, todavia, sabemos que se tratasse de um punhado de irmãos judeus, ou muçulmanos, ou, mesmo, de um só “gay” (ou lgbt) o alarido seria interminável, com declarações solenes de repúdio, ao mais alto nível, com movimentações e manifestações de rua, “debates” unanimemente escandalizados nas televisões e nas rádios, comunicados e abaixo-assinados por tudo quanto é redes sociais e inter-rede, enfim, um clamor estriduloso. 

Claro que empedernidos num egoísmo indiferente podemos ignorar, em contradição flagrante com a nossa Fé - que opera pela Caridade -, e mesmo a simples solidariedade humana, os sofrimentos e as injustiças que padecem esses nossos irmãos, cuidando que estamos a salvo numa pacífica segurança norte-ocidental.

A verdade porém é que se algum cristão ou qualquer outra pessoa de boa vontade se julga seguro, ou é ignorante, ou é ingénuo, ou é lorpa. A enorme insensatez ou cegueira da maioria dos cristãos e dos católicos, incluindo altos prelados, tem consistido em não quererem ver, ou então em cumpliciarem-se com uma minoria extremamente activa que de ano para ano, imparável, determinada, persistente, imbatível, tem vindo a conquistar as mentalidades, a sugar as almas, a inverter a moral, a corroer o bem comum, a cancerar a subsidiariedade, a derrancar a solidariedade, a torpedear a eminente dignidade transcendente de cada pessoa humana, a minar as instituições, a dominar a comunicação social, a controlar a justiça, a manipular a política, a ludibriar os Pastores.

A decisão obstinada de muitos prelados em “trabalhar” nos “bastidores” com as autoridades tem, ao contrário de tantos outros países, deixado o povo de Deus ignaro da Doutrina, privado de defesas, rendido à mentalidade dominante, incapaz de resistência, entorpecido numa modorra, entibiado por uma identidade desmaiada, se não mesmo moribunda, inábil para o combate espiritual, seguidor de lobos vorazes, abandonado aos predadores.

Contra os falsos profetas de um optimismo vão, tantas vezes desmascarado nas Sagradas Escrituras, é imprescindível tomar consciência da realidade, dos factos, para que cooperando com a Graça de Deus se dê lugar à Esperança verdadeira.

Se não despertarmos e não “combatermos o bom combate” seremos cruelmente perseguidos, impiedosamente lançados às enxovias, obscenamente abusados, implacavelmente entregues ao matadouro.

É inteiramente verdade que Nosso Senhor Jesus Cristo nos avisou das perseguições e da Cruz, em especial aos primeiros cristãos, que, sendo uma minoria minúscula, tinham de conquistar a imensa massa de povos idólatras. Mas o Senhor não disse que fossemos esparvoados, imbecis, cobardes, indiferentes, atoleimados, que nos deixássemos enredar pelas subtilezas astuciosas do Inimigo. Não nos mandou que fossemos passivos diante da injustiça, da mentira, da manipulação, do desamor. Pelo contrário, imperou-nos que amássemos radicalmente guerreando o mal e o pecado com a fortaleza que nos comunica pelo Seu Espírito. Se os cristãos, em particular os católicos, assim o tivessem feito aquando dos repetidos alertas de Pio IX, de Leão XIII, de Bento XIV, de Pio X, de Pio XI, de Pio XII, teriam impedido as monstruosas tragédias do comunismo, do nazismo, do fascismo. Quanta catástrofe, quanta hecatombe, quanto flagelo, quanta calamidade, quanta assolação, quanta violentíssima crueldade se teria evitado; quantas vidas poupadas, quantas almas salvadas, quantas famílias mantidas, quantas cidades inteiras, quantas nações em pacífica harmonia!

A alucinação geral contemporânea em que estamos mergulhados leva muitos a suporem que nos dias de hoje não existem, nem de longe nem de perto, perigos, mais ou menos, semelhantes. Esta enorme ilusão é já, evidentemente, uma consequência da programada mesmerização colectiva a que temos vindo a ser submetidos. Os alertas, então, do Bem-aventurado João Paulo II e os, agora, do Papa Bento XVI foram e são frequentes. Quereremos nós imitar a irresponsabilidade ou a insensatez das gerações que nos precederam deixando que as minorias malignas provoquem novas calamidades?

25. 01. 2013

quarta-feira, 26 de setembro de 2012

Christian leaders praise Romney, Republican platform

.- A diverse group of 28 Christian leaders has sent a letter to GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney praising him for the social policies included in the Republican Party's 2012 platform.

“On those matters of social policy that address our deepest concerns—the sanctity of human life, compassion for the downtrodden and persecuted, the identity of the family, and religious freedom, the Republican platform speaks clearly and powerfully,” the letter says.

The group also says the platform demonstrates the principles that will guide his administration if Romney is elected president.

The letter includes selections of the platform which its signatories particularly admire.

The Republican Party's “compassion for the downtrodden and persecuted” is exemplified in the letter by its allegiance to ending religious persecution overseas, to ending human trafficking, and a commitment to non-discrimination.
The letter applauds the defense of conscience and religious freedom in the platform, as well as the definition of marriage as the union of one man and one woman.

The letter also focuses on the moral principles in the Republican platform, which are “squarely within the Judeo-Christian tradition” and are “at stake in today's society.”
Romney and his running mate, Paul Ryan, are thanked for running on a platform which is a “political compass” in the “confusing moral thickets of our day.”

The signers encourage support for Romney even though there may be “differences in a candidate's theological doctrine.” This is despite the fact that “some have tempered their enthusiasm” for the Mormon candidate. Government policy is the issue, the letter says, not theology.

The letter is signed by 28 Christian leaders, both Catholic and Protestant, and includes the organizations to which each of the individuals belongs.

The Catholic signatories include Leonard Leo of The Catholic Association; Raymond Flynn, US Ambassador to the Vatican under President Clinton; Father Frank Pavone of Priests for Life; and Deal Hudson of The Catholic Advocate.

They are joined by Anthony Lauinger of National Right to Life; Peggy Hartshorn of Heartbeat International; Jim Daly of Focus on the Family; and Tony Perkins of Family Research Council.

Also signing were Frank Wright of National Religious Broadcasters and Alveda King, niece of Martin Luther King, Jr. and director of African American Outreach for Priests for Life.

The full text of the letter is as follows.

Mitt Romney
Romney for President
585 Commercial Street
Boston, MA 02109


Dear Governor Romney,

In this election year, matters of religious belief are once again highly visible in the public square. Some have tempered their enthusiasm for sound governing principles by their concern over differences in a candidate’s theological doctrine. It is time to remind ourselves that civil government is not about a particular theology but rather about public policy, and the question we ask is this one: what are the policy principles that will govern your administration should you prevail on Election Day.

For that answer we must look to the Republican platform, the document that most clearly defines your principles, and those of your party, on a wide range of topics. Among them are those that derive from Biblical truth, an important source of our nation’s political philosophy. As you know, this year the platform proposals received hearty debate and intense scrutiny by Republican delegates from every state just prior to the party convention in Tampa. The platform was adopted resoundingly and embraced wholeheartedly by you and your running mate Paul Ryan.

From our perspective as leaders who are motivated by Christian faith, it is a remarkably strong document and we congratulate you for it. On those matters of social policy that address our deepest concerns – the sanctity of human life, compassion for the downtrodden and persecuted, the identity of the family, and religious freedom, the Republican platform speaks clearly and powerfully. Its principles are squarely within the Judeo-Christian tradition, and we affirm the compelling words that convey its positions. Here are some of them:

Sanctity of Human Life

“Faithful to the 'self-evident' truths enshrined in the Declaration of Independence, we assert the sanctity of human life and affirm that the unborn child has a fundamental individual right to life which cannot be infringed. We support a human life amendment to the Constitution and endorse legislation to make clear that the Fourteenth Amendment’s protections apply to unborn children … (p. 14)”

“We also salute the many States that have passed laws for informed consent, mandatory waiting periods prior to an abortion, and health-protective clinic regulation. We seek to protect young girls from exploitation through a parental consent requirement; and we affirm our moral obligation to assist, rather than penalize, women challenged by an unplanned pregnancy (p.14).”

Defense of Marriage

“A serious threat to our country’s constitutional order … is an activist judiciary, in which some judges usurp the powers reserved to other branches of government. A blatant example has been the court-ordered redefinition of marriage in several States … It is an assault on the foundations of our society, challenging the institution which, for thousands of years in virtually every civilization, has been entrusted with the rearing of children and the transmission of cultural values.
“That is why Congressional Republicans took the lead in enacting the Defense of Marriage Act, affirming the right of States and the federal government not to recognize same-sex relationships licensed in other jurisdictions … We affirm our support for a Constitutional amendment defining marriage as the union of one man and one woman. We applaud the citizens of the majority of states which have enshrined in their constitutions the traditional concept of marriage, and we support the campaigns underway in several other States to do so. (p. 10).”


Religious Freedom

“The Republican Party includes Americans from every faith and tradition, and our policies and positions respect the right of every American to follow his or her beliefs and underscore our reverence for the religious freedom envisioned by the Founding Fathers of our nation and of our party. (p. 9).”
“We pledge to respect the religious beliefs and rights of conscience of all Americans and to safeguard the independence of their institutions from government … we assert every citizen’s right to apply religious values to public policy and the right of faith-based organizations to participate fully in public programs without renouncing their beliefs, removing religious symbols, or submitting to government-imposed hiring practices (p.12).”

Religious Persecution

“To those who stand in the darkness of tyranny, America has always been a beacon of hope, and so it must remain … Religious minorities across the Middle East are being driven from their ancient homelands, fanaticism leaves its bloody mark on both West and East Africa, and even among America’s Western friends and allies, pastors and families are penalized for their religious convictions. A Republican Administration will return the advocacy of religious liberty to a central place in our diplomacy (p. 45).”

Human Trafficking

As we approach the 150th anniversary of the Emancipation Proclamation, issued by the first Republican President Abraham Lincoln, we are reminded to be vigilant against human bondage in whatever form it appears. We will use the full force of the law against those who engage in modern-day forms of slavery, including the commercial sexual exploitation of children and the forced labor of men, women, and children (p.46).”

Non-discrimination

“... We consider discrimination based on sex, race, age, religion, creed, disability, or national origin unacceptable and immoral. We will strongly enforce anti-discrimination statutes and ask all to join us in rejecting the forces of hatred and bigotry and in denouncing all who practice or promote racism, anti-Semitism, ethnic prejudice, or religious intolerance (p.9).”

“The Republican Party includes Americans from every faith and tradition, and our policies and positions respect the right of every American to follow his or her beliefs and underscore our reverence for the religious freedom envisioned by the Founding Fathers of our nation and of our party. (p. 9).”

These then are some of the concepts in the Republican platform that speak to the moral principles at stake in today’s society. No such document will satisfy everyone, and its enactment will only be as vigorous as the political leaders we elect. Nonetheless, the platform is a strong statement of social principles, and we encourage everyone to judge it for themselves (it is available at http://whitehouse12.com/republican-party-platform/). In the confusing moral thickets of our day, this is a political compass that provides clear and sharp direction, a guide that is sorely needed by our country’s office holders. Once again we congratulate you and the Republican Party for your diligent work in producing the 2012 platform.


Cc: Reince Priebus, Chairman
 Republican National Committee

Signed by the following as individuals (affiliations listed for identification purposes only)
Raymond Ruddy
President, Gerard Health Foundation

Tom Minnery
Executive Director, Citizen Link

Margaret H. (“Peggy”) Hartshorn, Ph.D.
President, Heartbeat International

Jonathan Falwell
Thomas Road Baptist Church

Kristan Hawkins
President, Students for Life of America

Ralph Reed
President, Faith and Freedom Coalition

Leonard Leo
Director, The Catholic Association

Anthony Lauinger
Executive Vice President, National Right to Life

Joel Belz
Founder, World Magazine

Dr. Jack C. Willke, MD
President, Life Issue Institute

Joseph A. Brinck
President, Sanctity of Life Foundation

James Bopp, Jr.
The Bopp Law Firm

Raymond L. Flynn
Former Mayor of Boston and U.S. Ambassador to the Vatican

Andrea S. Lafferty
President, Traditional Values Coalition

Rev Louis P. Sheldon
Chairman and Founder, Traditional Values Coalition

Fr. Frank Pavone
National Director, Priests for Life
President, National Pro-life Religious Council

Dr. Alveda King
Director, African American Outreach Priests For Life

Tim Wildmon
President, American Family Association and American Family Radio

Penny Young Nance
President, Concerned Women for America

Jim Daly
President, Focus on the Family

Deal Hudson
The Catholic Advocate

Tony Perkins
President, Family Research Council

Franklin Graham
President, Samaritan’s Purse

Gary Bauer
President,
American Values

Allen & Leslee Unruh
Alpha Center & National Abstinence Clearinghouse

Jerry Falwell, Jr.
Chancellor and President, Liberty University

Rev. Samuel Rodriguez
President NHCLC Hispanic Evangelical Association

Frank Wright, Ph.D.
President and CEO, National Religious Broadcasters

quinta-feira, 26 de julho de 2012

El COI prohíbe que los aficionados tengan la Biblia o libros religiosos en el recinto olímpico

In Religión en Libertad

El COI ha dado a conocer la lista de exigencias para los aficionados durante los Juegos Olímpicos, entre las que se encuentra la prohibición expresa de que ningún material impreso o libro de carácter religioso podrá ser introducido en los estadios.

Una medida que choca curiosamente con las Olimpiadas de Pekín 2008, cuando las autoridades chinas permitieron que todos aquellos que lo desearan pudieran disponer de Biblias, Nuevos Testamentos, informa Libertad Digital.

El COI, como siempre, se ha excusado en que pretende aislar el deporte de cualquier conflicto religioso o político, exactamente el mismo motivo por el que no quiso llevar a cabo ningún homenaje a los atletas israelíes asesinados en Munich hace ahora 40 años.

Más prohibiciones
Otra de las prohibiciones a los aficionados será la de portar camisetas con marcas, a no ser que sea alguna de las patrocinadoras, así como con mensajes políticos. Tampoco se podrá introducir comida ni bebida en ninguno de los recintos, salvo que sea para bebés. Obviamente, todo a favor de McDonalds y Coca-Cola, que estarán muy presentes en Londres durante los Juegos.

Tampoco las vuvuzelas
Otras medidas restrictivas es que los aficionados no lleven a los eventos con grandes cantidades de monedas, pues éstas podrían ser utilizados como arma arrojadiza. También, estarán prohibidos los bates, armas de fuego, mástiles de banderas, sprays, cuchillos... así como las famosas vuvuzelas, de moda en el Mundial de Sudáfrica, y que serán prohibidas –junto con pitos, tambores o cuernos- para no molestar al resto de aficionados, índica Libertad Digital.

Discriminación hacía los heterosexuales
Por su parte, Mark Russell y su esposa Lauryn, tiradores del equipo australiano han manifestado que se les discrimina “por ser heterosexuales”, informa Forum Libertas.

Mark Russell afirma que él y su esposa Lauryn están siendo discriminados, y afirman que saben de parejas homosexuales que comparten habitación en la Vila Olímpica con autorización expresa de los organizadores. Cuando hicieron la solicitud se les dijo que tendría que alquilar una habitación en un hotel si quería compartir una cama, a lo que la pareja responde que siempre comparten una habitación durante los campeonatos más importantes de todo el mundo.

Russell ha afirmado que está siendo discriminado porque no puede compartir la habitación con su mujer atleta, mientras que las parejas homosexuales pueden.

Según el mismo diario, la decisión fue tomada por un episodio sucedido en Australia en el que Russell se enfrentó a la AOC debido al consumo de éste de píldoras para dormir. La AOC prohibió ese tipo de medicamentos en los Juegos Olímpicos, pero Russell respondió que para él eran “esenciales para ayudar a desempeñarse mejor”.

Su esposa Lauryn también cree que las desavenencias con la AOC se derivan de su participación en una sesión de fotos para la revista Zoo vestida con un bikini y sosteniendo una escopeta. Unas fotografías cuya recaudación está dirigida para el Hospital Royal Children.

“La parte tonta de esto –ha afirmado el tirador australiano-, es que les he contestado que hay un montón de parejas gay en el equipo olímpico que tendrán el alojamiento de forma conjunta, por lo que estamos siendo discriminados por nuestra condición de heterosexuales”.

Además, Russell argumentó que el problema deriva “de mi postura sobre las pastillas para dormir”. Russell añadió que era evidente que los funcionarios tenían un problema con ellos y que se les estaba castigando.