Mostrar mensagens com a etiqueta Tráfico humano. Mostrar todas as mensagens
Mostrar mensagens com a etiqueta Tráfico humano. Mostrar todas as mensagens

sexta-feira, 6 de setembro de 2013

Hotels and the Pornography Plague: An Example of Moral Responsibility from Scandinavia - by Robert P. George and Hamza Yusuf

In TPD

A bit more than a year ago, we made public here on Public Discourse a letter we had sent to the chief executive officers of our nation’s largest hotel chains, respectfully asking them to stop offering pornography in their hotel rooms. We said:

We are, respectively, a Christian and a Muslim, but we appeal to you not on the basis of truths revealed in our scriptures but on the basis of a commitment that should be shared by all people of reason and goodwill: a commitment to human dignity and the common good. As teachers and as parents, we seek a society in which young people are encouraged to respect others and themselves—treating no one as an impersonal object or thing. We hope that you share our desire to build such a society.

Pornography is degrading, dehumanizing, and corrupting. It undermines self-respect and respect for others. It reduces persons—creatures bearing profound, inherent, and equal dignity—to the status of objects. It robs a central aspect of our humanity—our sexuality—of its dignity and beauty. It ensnares some in addiction. It deprives others of their sense of self-worth. It teaches our young people to settle for the cheap satisfactions of lust, rather than to do the hard, yet ultimately liberating and fulfilling, work of love.

One hotel chain, Marriott, informed us that they were “phasing out” offerings of pornography in their hotel rooms. Another, Hilton, defended its participation in the pornography business by appealing, dubiously in our view, to libertarian principles. Others, so far as we can tell, have ignored our plea.

We wish to reiterate that plea here, however, by holding up to the American hotel executives the highly laudable actions of Petter Stordalen, owner of Nordic Hotels, one of Scandinavia’s largest chains. Mr. Stordalen, after becoming involved in international efforts to fight the horrific practice of trafficking women and girls into sexual slavery, announced that pornography would no longer be offered to his customers. In a public statement explaining his decision, he said:

The porn industry contributes to trafficking, so I see it as a natural part of having a social responsibility to send out a clear signal that Nordic Hotels doesn't support or condone this.

He’s right. The pornography industry is corrupt through and through—inherently so. It should come as no surprise that it is connected to something as exploitative, degrading, and dehumanizing as human trafficking. Bravo to Petter Stordalen for refusing to continue profiting from peddling the industry’s wares.

Of course, even if trafficking were not part of the reality of the industry, good people should be opposed to pornography and unwilling to profit from it. As we said in our letter to hotel executives:

We beg you to consider the young woman who is depicted as a sexual object in these movies, as nothing but a bundle of raw animal appetites whose sex organs are displayed to the voyeurs of the world and whose body is used in loveless and utterly depersonalized sex acts. Surely we should regard that young woman as we would regard a sister, daughter, or mother. She is a precious member of the human family. You may say that she freely chooses to compromise her dignity in this way, and in some cases that would be true, but that gives you no right to avail yourself of her self-degradation for the sake of financial gain. Would you be willing to profit from her self-degradation if she were your sister? Would you be willing to profit from her self-degradation if she were your own beloved daughter?

The reality is, however, just as Mr. Stordalen depicts it. Human trafficking is part of the reality. And it is time for his fellow hotel executives to face up to that fact.

Indeed, it is time for Mr. Stordalen’s American counterparts to follow his commendable example. If Nordic Hotels can demonstrate this kind of moral and social responsibility, then there is no reason that Hilton Hotels and the other large chains cannot. Let them stop trying to deceive the public—and perhaps even themselves—with rhetoric about respecting or even protecting their customers’ liberty. Pornography is a social plague with horrific real-life consequences for real live people—addicts, spouses, children, communities, girls and women trafficked into sexual servitude.

At this late season of our nation’s experience with the social costs of pornography there is no longer any excuse for supposing that porn is merely a form of harmless naughtiness. Even the socially very liberal nation of Iceland is moving to ban or severely restrict it by law. Whatever one thinks of legal prohibitions or restrictions, everyone should recognize that pornography is a moral and social evil that no decent person would want to profit from or have anything to do with.

quarta-feira, 26 de setembro de 2012

Christian leaders praise Romney, Republican platform

.- A diverse group of 28 Christian leaders has sent a letter to GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney praising him for the social policies included in the Republican Party's 2012 platform.

“On those matters of social policy that address our deepest concerns—the sanctity of human life, compassion for the downtrodden and persecuted, the identity of the family, and religious freedom, the Republican platform speaks clearly and powerfully,” the letter says.

The group also says the platform demonstrates the principles that will guide his administration if Romney is elected president.

The letter includes selections of the platform which its signatories particularly admire.

The Republican Party's “compassion for the downtrodden and persecuted” is exemplified in the letter by its allegiance to ending religious persecution overseas, to ending human trafficking, and a commitment to non-discrimination.
The letter applauds the defense of conscience and religious freedom in the platform, as well as the definition of marriage as the union of one man and one woman.

The letter also focuses on the moral principles in the Republican platform, which are “squarely within the Judeo-Christian tradition” and are “at stake in today's society.”
Romney and his running mate, Paul Ryan, are thanked for running on a platform which is a “political compass” in the “confusing moral thickets of our day.”

The signers encourage support for Romney even though there may be “differences in a candidate's theological doctrine.” This is despite the fact that “some have tempered their enthusiasm” for the Mormon candidate. Government policy is the issue, the letter says, not theology.

The letter is signed by 28 Christian leaders, both Catholic and Protestant, and includes the organizations to which each of the individuals belongs.

The Catholic signatories include Leonard Leo of The Catholic Association; Raymond Flynn, US Ambassador to the Vatican under President Clinton; Father Frank Pavone of Priests for Life; and Deal Hudson of The Catholic Advocate.

They are joined by Anthony Lauinger of National Right to Life; Peggy Hartshorn of Heartbeat International; Jim Daly of Focus on the Family; and Tony Perkins of Family Research Council.

Also signing were Frank Wright of National Religious Broadcasters and Alveda King, niece of Martin Luther King, Jr. and director of African American Outreach for Priests for Life.

The full text of the letter is as follows.

Mitt Romney
Romney for President
585 Commercial Street
Boston, MA 02109


Dear Governor Romney,

In this election year, matters of religious belief are once again highly visible in the public square. Some have tempered their enthusiasm for sound governing principles by their concern over differences in a candidate’s theological doctrine. It is time to remind ourselves that civil government is not about a particular theology but rather about public policy, and the question we ask is this one: what are the policy principles that will govern your administration should you prevail on Election Day.

For that answer we must look to the Republican platform, the document that most clearly defines your principles, and those of your party, on a wide range of topics. Among them are those that derive from Biblical truth, an important source of our nation’s political philosophy. As you know, this year the platform proposals received hearty debate and intense scrutiny by Republican delegates from every state just prior to the party convention in Tampa. The platform was adopted resoundingly and embraced wholeheartedly by you and your running mate Paul Ryan.

From our perspective as leaders who are motivated by Christian faith, it is a remarkably strong document and we congratulate you for it. On those matters of social policy that address our deepest concerns – the sanctity of human life, compassion for the downtrodden and persecuted, the identity of the family, and religious freedom, the Republican platform speaks clearly and powerfully. Its principles are squarely within the Judeo-Christian tradition, and we affirm the compelling words that convey its positions. Here are some of them:

Sanctity of Human Life

“Faithful to the 'self-evident' truths enshrined in the Declaration of Independence, we assert the sanctity of human life and affirm that the unborn child has a fundamental individual right to life which cannot be infringed. We support a human life amendment to the Constitution and endorse legislation to make clear that the Fourteenth Amendment’s protections apply to unborn children … (p. 14)”

“We also salute the many States that have passed laws for informed consent, mandatory waiting periods prior to an abortion, and health-protective clinic regulation. We seek to protect young girls from exploitation through a parental consent requirement; and we affirm our moral obligation to assist, rather than penalize, women challenged by an unplanned pregnancy (p.14).”

Defense of Marriage

“A serious threat to our country’s constitutional order … is an activist judiciary, in which some judges usurp the powers reserved to other branches of government. A blatant example has been the court-ordered redefinition of marriage in several States … It is an assault on the foundations of our society, challenging the institution which, for thousands of years in virtually every civilization, has been entrusted with the rearing of children and the transmission of cultural values.
“That is why Congressional Republicans took the lead in enacting the Defense of Marriage Act, affirming the right of States and the federal government not to recognize same-sex relationships licensed in other jurisdictions … We affirm our support for a Constitutional amendment defining marriage as the union of one man and one woman. We applaud the citizens of the majority of states which have enshrined in their constitutions the traditional concept of marriage, and we support the campaigns underway in several other States to do so. (p. 10).”


Religious Freedom

“The Republican Party includes Americans from every faith and tradition, and our policies and positions respect the right of every American to follow his or her beliefs and underscore our reverence for the religious freedom envisioned by the Founding Fathers of our nation and of our party. (p. 9).”
“We pledge to respect the religious beliefs and rights of conscience of all Americans and to safeguard the independence of their institutions from government … we assert every citizen’s right to apply religious values to public policy and the right of faith-based organizations to participate fully in public programs without renouncing their beliefs, removing religious symbols, or submitting to government-imposed hiring practices (p.12).”

Religious Persecution

“To those who stand in the darkness of tyranny, America has always been a beacon of hope, and so it must remain … Religious minorities across the Middle East are being driven from their ancient homelands, fanaticism leaves its bloody mark on both West and East Africa, and even among America’s Western friends and allies, pastors and families are penalized for their religious convictions. A Republican Administration will return the advocacy of religious liberty to a central place in our diplomacy (p. 45).”

Human Trafficking

As we approach the 150th anniversary of the Emancipation Proclamation, issued by the first Republican President Abraham Lincoln, we are reminded to be vigilant against human bondage in whatever form it appears. We will use the full force of the law against those who engage in modern-day forms of slavery, including the commercial sexual exploitation of children and the forced labor of men, women, and children (p.46).”

Non-discrimination

“... We consider discrimination based on sex, race, age, religion, creed, disability, or national origin unacceptable and immoral. We will strongly enforce anti-discrimination statutes and ask all to join us in rejecting the forces of hatred and bigotry and in denouncing all who practice or promote racism, anti-Semitism, ethnic prejudice, or religious intolerance (p.9).”

“The Republican Party includes Americans from every faith and tradition, and our policies and positions respect the right of every American to follow his or her beliefs and underscore our reverence for the religious freedom envisioned by the Founding Fathers of our nation and of our party. (p. 9).”

These then are some of the concepts in the Republican platform that speak to the moral principles at stake in today’s society. No such document will satisfy everyone, and its enactment will only be as vigorous as the political leaders we elect. Nonetheless, the platform is a strong statement of social principles, and we encourage everyone to judge it for themselves (it is available at http://whitehouse12.com/republican-party-platform/). In the confusing moral thickets of our day, this is a political compass that provides clear and sharp direction, a guide that is sorely needed by our country’s office holders. Once again we congratulate you and the Republican Party for your diligent work in producing the 2012 platform.


Cc: Reince Priebus, Chairman
 Republican National Committee

Signed by the following as individuals (affiliations listed for identification purposes only)
Raymond Ruddy
President, Gerard Health Foundation

Tom Minnery
Executive Director, Citizen Link

Margaret H. (“Peggy”) Hartshorn, Ph.D.
President, Heartbeat International

Jonathan Falwell
Thomas Road Baptist Church

Kristan Hawkins
President, Students for Life of America

Ralph Reed
President, Faith and Freedom Coalition

Leonard Leo
Director, The Catholic Association

Anthony Lauinger
Executive Vice President, National Right to Life

Joel Belz
Founder, World Magazine

Dr. Jack C. Willke, MD
President, Life Issue Institute

Joseph A. Brinck
President, Sanctity of Life Foundation

James Bopp, Jr.
The Bopp Law Firm

Raymond L. Flynn
Former Mayor of Boston and U.S. Ambassador to the Vatican

Andrea S. Lafferty
President, Traditional Values Coalition

Rev Louis P. Sheldon
Chairman and Founder, Traditional Values Coalition

Fr. Frank Pavone
National Director, Priests for Life
President, National Pro-life Religious Council

Dr. Alveda King
Director, African American Outreach Priests For Life

Tim Wildmon
President, American Family Association and American Family Radio

Penny Young Nance
President, Concerned Women for America

Jim Daly
President, Focus on the Family

Deal Hudson
The Catholic Advocate

Tony Perkins
President, Family Research Council

Franklin Graham
President, Samaritan’s Purse

Gary Bauer
President,
American Values

Allen & Leslee Unruh
Alpha Center & National Abstinence Clearinghouse

Jerry Falwell, Jr.
Chancellor and President, Liberty University

Rev. Samuel Rodriguez
President NHCLC Hispanic Evangelical Association

Frank Wright, Ph.D.
President and CEO, National Religious Broadcasters

quinta-feira, 27 de outubro de 2011

Bishop Lori testifies on threats to religious liberty, urges action

By Michelle Bauman

.- The U.S. bishops’ point man on religious liberty urged the U.S. Congress to protect the right to religious freedom in America because of several actions taken by the Obama administration.

“Religious liberty is not merely one right among others, but enjoys a certain primacy,” Bishop William E. Lori said in his Oct. 26 testimony before the House Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on the Constitution.

“Not coincidentally, religious liberty is first on the list in the Bill of Rights, the charter of our Nation’s most cherished and fundamental freedoms,” he said.

Bishop Lori was announced as the first chairman of the bishops’ Ad Hoc Committee for Religious Liberty on Sept. 29, 2011.

Bishop Lori said that his brother bishops are greatly concerned by recent attacks on religious freedom. In his testimony, he outlined several recent “threats to religious liberty” in the United States.

Bishop Lori criticized regulations issued in August by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to require coverage of sterilization and contraception, including abortifacients, in nearly all private health insurance plans. He explained that the religious exemption included in the regulations is too narrow to apply to most Catholic organizations.

The bishop also called attention to new requirements for contractors who work with human trafficking victims. Due to these regulations, he said, the bishops’ Migration and Refugee Services, which previously worked with the government to aid victims of trafficking “will be barred from participation in the program because they cannot in conscience provide the ‘full range’ of reproductive services – namely, abortion and contraception.”

Likewise, Bishop Lori noted, the State Department’s U.S. Agency for International Development is increasingly requiring contractors to provide contraception in relief and development programs across the world. Doing so, he explained, will exclude organizations such as Catholic Relief Services from “helping to prevent and treat AIDS in Africa and other developing nations.”

The bishop also criticized the federal Department of Justice for not only failing to defend the Defense of Marriage Act but also “filing briefs actively attacking DOMA’s constitutionality, claiming that supporters of the law could only have been motivated by bias and prejudice.”

He said the Department of Justice has further undermined religious liberty in the “ministerial exception” case, Hosanna Tabor v. EEOC, which is currently before the Supreme Court. He said that the department “needlessly attacked the very existence of the exception, in opposition to a vast coalition of religious groups urging its preservation through their amicus curiae briefs.”

Bishop Lori also expressed disappointment in a failure to adequately protect religious liberty at the state level. He gave the example of county clerks in New York who are facing legal action for refusing to take part in granting same-sex unions, and a case involving Catholic Charities in Illinois being prevented from providing foster care because they recognize “the unique value of man-woman marriage for the well-being of children.”

The bishop acknowledged that the underlying problem is rooted in American culture, which must ultimately be addressed. In the meantime, he said, Congress must make an effort to “treat the symptoms immediately, lest the disease spread so quickly that the patient is overcome before the ultimate cure can be formulated and delivered.”

Bishop Lori applauded three bills currently in Congress to fight the insurance contraception mandate and other health care concerns.

He said that the Protect Life Act, the Abortion Non-Discrimination Act and the Respect for Rights of Conscience Act all “go a long way toward guaranteeing religious liberty and freedom of conscience for religious employers, health insurers, and health care providers.”

“United with my brother bishops, and in the name of religious liberty, I urge these three bills be swiftly passed by Congress so they may be signed into law.”

In response to the regulations placed on religious human service providers, Bishop Lori urged “a congressional hearing or other form of investigation to ensure compliance with the applicable conscience laws, as well as to identify how these new requirements came to be imposed.”

Regarding the Defense of Marriage Act, he called on Congress to “resist legislative efforts to repeal the law.” He added that the Department of Justice’s “decisions to abandon both DOMA and the ‘ministerial exception’ seem to warrant congressional inquiry.”

The bishop urged Congress to immediately take these measures to protect the religious freedom that belongs to individuals as well as “churches and other religious institutions.”

Religious liberty, he said, is endowed by our Creator and is therefore “prior to the state itself.”

“Thus government has a perennial obligation to acknowledge and protect religious liberty as fundamental, no matter the moral and political trends of the moment,” he said.

sexta-feira, 2 de setembro de 2011

End Human Trafficking: A Contemporary Slavery -


A culture of exploitation and violence, especially sexual exploitation of children, is at epidemic levels here in the United States and around the world. The current Administration’s response is anemic and more must be done.

When Congress passed the Trafficking Victims Protection Act in 2000, it found that even as the 21st century began, the degrading institution of slavery continued throughout the world. Trafficking in persons is the recruiting, transporting, harboring, obtaining, or selling of a person by force, fraud, or coercion, for purposes of commercial sexual exploitation or forced labor. Human trafficking is a multi-dimensional problem. It is a transnational crime connected to other transnational crimes, such as drug and arms trafficking; it is a human rights issue, because it deprives the people being bought and sold of their basic rights and freedoms; it is a global health problem connected to the spread of HIV/AIDS and other serious communicable diseases; finally, it is a national security issue, because it fuels organized crime, threatens the rule of law, and creates trafficking pipelines that can be utilized by terrorist and extremist organizations looking to carry out violent acts.

We do not know the full nature and scope of this modern-day slavery. However, experts estimate that as many as 27 million people are trapped in some form of slavery around the world today. According to the most recent analysis from the United Nations, many of these are women and children trafficked into the international sex trade. A report released by the United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime (UNODC) claims that human trafficking is a growing phenomenon, that 79% of the crimes are for commercial sexual exploitation (as opposed to 18% for forced labor), and that the vast majority of victims are women and children.

Similarly, between January 1, 2008, and June 30, 2010, the U.S. Department of Justice captured information from 42 jurisdictions covering nearly 25% of the U.S. resident population. While these jurisdictions were not representative of the entire nation, they were widely dispersed geographically. This information was categorized and analyzed by the U.S. Department of Justice Bureau of Justice Statistics before being compiled into a special report. The report noted that 81% of confirmed traffickers were male, while 94% of confirmed sex trafficking victims were female. Of confirmed labor trafficking victims, 68% were female. Most of the sex trafficking victims in the U.S. were younger than 25 years old.

Many people assume that trafficked persons in America come primarily from other countries—illegally smuggled immigrants, tricked by the promise of employment. While this is the case for some victims, surprisingly, most victims are not foreigners. They are actually young women and children born here in the United States. In fact, according the Department of Justice report, more than four-fifths of victims in confirmed sex trafficking incidents were identified as U.S. citizens (83%). These statistics confirm the fact that trafficking in the U.S. is not primarily an international problem. It is a domestic problem that involves the trafficking of our own young women and children into prostitution and pornography. Some experts say that as many as a quarter-million of our children are trapped in various forms of commercial sexual exploitation.

Clearly, these grim statistics suggest that human trafficking is a problem of epidemic proportions. We urgently need to confront this crisis and undertake every possible measure to identify, rescue, and rehabilitate the victims. In addition, we need vigorous enforcement of federal, state, and local laws prohibiting trafficking. Finally, we need creative new approaches to addressing the demand side of human trafficking.

If our challenge at the end of the 20th century was to recognize that human trafficking was a growing phenomenon, the crime of choice for international criminal enterprises, our challenge in the 21st century is to link up our efforts—to make connections between the various forms of trafficking and to organize across various barriers. For too long our work has been stove-piped, with one organization focusing on sex trafficking and another on sex tourism, one on child pornography and another on child abduction. Traffickers are already organized; they are organized across language barriers, across ethnic and cultural differences, across national and geographic boundaries, and more. On the internet, they have learned how to use the new technologies to transmit sexually exploitive images. They have perfected techniques for stalking online. They have created special sex-oriented chat rooms and special global sex clubs. They have encrypted and encoded their activities to make them more difficult to find. They have formed professional associations to protect their interests and formulate new strategies for their future. On our streets, they have perfected methods for identifying and recruiting the most vulnerable of our children. They have developed domestic pimping circuits that move juveniles across state and county lines. They have located and cultivated a clientele to sell to—and in so doing, they have grown rich and powerful enough to build alliances, buy allegiances, and even set up and resource NGOs to make their points for them.

Across the globe, traffickers understood long before we did that sex tourism is just the opposite side of the sex trafficking coin. While in sex trafficking, you transport the women and children to the buyer, in sex tourism, you transport the buyer to the women and children. They have identified whole countries, usually resource poor, where the most heinous crimes can be committed with hardly anyone blinking an eye; and they’ve identified other countries, usually resource rich, where men will spend money to travel to commit unspeakable acts, if they think they can get away with it. The amount of money that passes hands in these criminal enterprises —over the internet, on our streets, and across international borders—is estimated at somewhere around 32 billion dollars, and that figure is probably conservative, according to the International Labor Organization (ILO). No wonder it is called a “sex industry.”

In the face of what some experts have called the fastest growing criminal enterprise in the world, this Administration’s response has been anemic at best. Social conservatives have carried the water on this issue for over a decade and continue to demonstrate leadership. In 2012 and beyond, these are the six pillars for success in addressing human trafficking:

  1. Public Awareness. Human trafficking, particularly sex trafficking, is a burgeoning criminal enterprise in the United States and around the world. Victims are men and women, adults and children, international and domestic. Trafficking can happen in the commercial sex industry, including street prostitution, strip clubs, massage parlors, escort services, brothels, and on the internet; in factories such as garment centers, meat-packing plants, farms, mining industries, , or construction; in private homes that employ housekeepers, nannies, or servile marriages; in restaurants, bars, and other service industries such as nail or hair salons. Recognizing that we have a problem and committing to a zero-tolerance standard is the first step to solving it. We have had some small success with general awareness campaigns. If elected president, a candidate must start educational campaigns tailored to specific businesses and work sectors where trafficking occurs.
  2. Law and Law Enforcement. The U.S. has an excellent federal law against trafficking, but at the state level, laws are inadequate to deter trafficking and to bring traffickers to justice. Without comprehensive laws, law enforcement officials don’t have the tools to arrest, charge, prosecute, and convict traffickers. Most states have prohibited trafficking, but few, if any, have a victim-centered approach with shelters and services for trafficking victims. Some state laws still fail to reflect the gravity of the offenses involved. For example, in many states, an adult who sexually assaults a child is prosecuted under statutory rape laws, while if that same adult pays for sex with a child, he is most often charged (if he is charged at all) with a misdemeanor offense of soliciting.
  3. Focus on Demand. Like drug trafficking, human trafficking is a business involving a triangle of activity: supply, demand, and distribution. Unlike drug trafficking, however, there is very little focus on the demand side of the human trafficking business. While some men who buy sex are unaware of the harm to themselves, their families, their communities, and the women trapped in prostitution, far more are crass consumers in the sex industry. A renewed and vigorous focus on the men who fuel the market for commercial sex is imperative.
  4. Health Consequences. Trafficking exposes victims to serious health risks. Victims of trafficking often endure brutal conditions that result in physical, mental, emotional, and psychological trauma. Women and children trafficked in the sex industry are exposed to deadly diseases, including HIV and AIDS, TB, hepatitis, and other serious communicable diseases. In addition, many women trafficked into prostitution are given drugs or use them to numb themselves against the acts they must perform. Substance abuse and drug addiction are serious problems in human trafficking. Trafficking victims are beaten, burned, assaulted, threatened, and intimidated by traffickers and customers. Health consequences include pregnancy, forced abortion and/or abortion-related complications. In the first big sex trafficking case uncovered in the U.S., young women and children who were trafficked from Mexico to rural Florida were forced to have multiple abortions, and then forced back into the brothel the next day. In Turkey, young women and girls trafficked into prostitution had abortifacients injected into their stomachs with needles. In U.S. emergency rooms, community health clinics, HIV/AIDS clinics, and other government-funded health centers, health providers are the first (and sometimes only) people who encounter victims of human trafficking. Teaching health providers how to identify victims and catalyze a rescue is key. In the long term, preventing human trafficking will eliminate costs to the healthcare system that are inevitable consequences of human trafficking.
  5. Shelters and Service Providers. As one victim assistance organization has noted, appropriate protective shelters and services are critical for the protection and restoration of trafficking victims. Currently, these shelters are reimbursed on a per victim basis, making it virtually impossible to establish long-term institutional stability and proper care for victims. The situation of domestic minor sex trafficking victims is worse: they are generally placed in juvenile detention or returned to the home from which they fled. The lack of adequate anti-trafficking shelters across the nation is preventing first responders from succeeding in protecting and gaining justice for the victims.
  6. Nature and Scope of the Problem. The state of knowledge regarding the extent and nature of human trafficking, and efforts to combat it and ameliorate its effects, is insufficient. Most information regarding human trafficking is still anecdotal, limited in scope, and often affected by the advocacy biases of the researchers. Over the last ten years, the United Stattes has spent upwards of $800,000,000.00 (800 million dollars) in over a dozen USG agencies. Very little of these funds have been on research. Congress has called for more information on the causes of human trafficking, the nature and scope of the problem, the methods of recruitment and transportation, the types of trafficking, global and domestic law enforcement data, and the public and private health implications of human trafficking. The William Wilberforce Act of 2008 (TVPRA 2008) called for:

An effective mechanism for quantifying the number of victims of trafficking on a national, regional, and international basis and mandated the creation of a database utilizing information from all federal agencies and, to the extent practicable, applicable data from relevant international organizations to:

(A) improve the coordination of the collection of data related to trafficking in persons by each agency of the United States Government that collects such data;
(B) promote uniformity of such data collection, standards, and systems related to such collection;
(C) undertake a meta-analysis of patterns of trafficking in persons, slavery, and slave-like conditions to develop and analyze global trends in human trafficking;
(D) identify emerging issues in human trafficking and establish integrated methods to combat them; and
(E) identify research priorities to respond to global patterns and emerging issues.

While we clearly need research that yields rigorous quantitative and qualitative information on human trafficking, the political will to support such research is lacking. It is critical for candidates and for the future president to encourage research initiatives for generating systematic knowledge to combat global human trafficking. After all, which would we rather have: a hospital at the bottom of the cliff or a fence at the top? Good information/intel is the fence at the top.

Human trafficking is a global problem with regard to law enforcement, human rights, and health. It is a multi-billion-dollar industry, with millions of victims trapped in slavery and slavery-like conditions. Although it is a sizable and complex problem, it can be solved. Two centuries ago, British and U.S. citizens organized an abolitionist movement to eradicate African chattel slavery. They tackled first the slave trade and then slavery itself. They were successful in outlawing and eventually eradicating it. Today, we are building another critical mass of people to abolish these new forms of contemporary slavery. We must learn to coordinate and collaborate, to work together towards a common goal. A candidate for president must have a global vision and lead us toward abolition. If we have such a president, we will surely succeed.

Laura Lederer is President of Global Centurion and adjunct professor at Georgetown Law Center.